Banner

Interested in the products mentioned in this resource?

Send us a message

Contributors

Nikaoly Ciriaco1, Esther Zamora3, Santiago Escrivá3, Rosa Somoza1, Javier Hernández-Losa1, Santiago Ramón y Cajal1, Martín Espinosa-Bravo2, Kaja Wieghardt4, Hillary Sloane4, Anna Starus4, Frank Holtrup4, Johannes Fredebohm4, Daniel L. Edelstein4, Lucy Georgieva5, Graham Speight5, Frederick S. Jones4, and Vicente Peg1

1Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 2Breast Surgical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 3Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 4Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore , USA, 5Oxford Gene Technology, Oxford, UK

Background

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is being used widely to eliminate tumor burden in breast cancer (BC) patients; the primary goal of such treatments is to reduce the cancer prior to surgery. Although the standard of care is to perform surgery of primary BC after NAT, it is well known that for certain patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR), surgery following such treatment may be unnecessary.

Previous studies have shown that levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during therapy and post-surgery can stratify patients that exhibit effective responses vs. those showing minimal residual disease. In this study, we performed longitudinal tracking of plasma TP53 and PIK3CA mutations pre-specified from NGS analysis of tumor tissue specimens from HER2-positive (HER2) and triple negative (TN) BC patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess ctDNA clearance during NAT as a correlate to effective response to treatment, as benchmarked by clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR). To accomplish this, a prospective study was conducted to identify patient-specific PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in tissue using SureSeq NGS technology, which could then be used to track the presence/absence of mutations prior to, during, and following NAT using Sysmex SafeSEQ technology.

Patients and methods

In total, 29 TN and HER2-positive BC patients were examined in this study. Tumor tissue samples from all patients were first examined for mutations in both the PIK3CA or TP53 genes using SureSeq technology (Oxford Gene Technology) after isolation of DNA using Qiasymphony DNA Tissue Kits. Individualized plasma ctDNA detection assays using SafeSEQ technology (Sysmex Inostics) were then applied to detect the specific mutations identified in tissue. Mutation detection was carried out in serial plasma samples in each BC patient at baseline prior to NAT, at treatment mid-point, and at post-treatment immediately prior to surgery. ctDNA analyses were performed only on patient samples in which a specific TP53 or PIK3CA mutation had been initially identified in that patient’s tissue. All patients underwent a surgical excision after NAT. Patient characteristics are shown below in Table 1.

Results

  • Of the 29 patients, 20 (69%) were found to have TP53 and/or PIK3CA mutations in tissue, as assessed by SureSeq.
  • Of these 20 BC patients with mutations identified in tissue, 19 (95%) and 6 (30%) were found to have at least 1 TP53 or PIK3CA mutation, respectively, with 6 patients (30%) being positive for both TP53 and PIK3CA mutations. PIK3CA mutations were found predominantly in HER2-positive BC patients (37.5%), whereas PIK3CA mutations were found in only 7.7% of TN BC patients. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of TN BC patients (84.6%) showed at least one TP53 mutation.
  • Of the 20 patients with TP53 and/or PIK3CA mutations identified in tissue, 17 (85%) showed detectable mutations using SafeSEQ in the plasma sample taken at baseline.
  • The 17 patients having ctDNA detected at baseline were tracked longitudinally during NAT to correlate presence of ctDNA with efficacy of treatment (see Table 2). 12/17 patients attained clinical complete response (cCR) following NAT (8 TN BC; 4 HER2+), as indicated in green in Table 2. In contrast, 5 patients did not achieve cCR (3 TN BC; 2 HER2+), indicated in pink in Table 2.
  • Of 15 patients with plasma samples available at mid-treatment, 5 (33%) showed detectable ctDNA (3 cCR patients vs 2 non-cCR patients).
  • Immediately prior to surgery, 16/17 patient plasma samples were available for testing. Only 3 of these patients (18.8%) showed detectable ctDNA, and, importantly all 3 did NOT show cCR. Interestingly, none of the 11 cCR patients whose plasma was evaluated at surgery showed detectable ctDNA.
  • Finally, in 37 plasma samples collected from the 17 patients over 3 time points post-surgery, no sample showed detectable ctDNA.

Conclusions

  • SafeSEQ NGS technology identified 17/20 (85%) BC patients with detectable mutations in plasma at baseline, enabling the vast majority of patients to be tracked via liquid biopsy during/following NAT.
  • The absence of ctDNA following NAT was observed in 100% of cCR patients, indicating a favorable correlation with effective NAT response; moreover, the presence of ctDNA following NAT may associate with the lack of clinical/pathological complete response in BC patients.
  • These findings prompt further studies/trials to investigate the value of ctDNA to predict clinical/pathological response that may aid in determining whether surgery is really necessary following neoadjuvant treatment.

 

SureSeq™: For Research Use Only; Not for Diagnostic Procedures.

Connect with our NGS experts today

Call +44 (0)1865 856800 Email contact@ogt.com

Send us a message and we will get back to you