Clearance of ctDNA in triple negative and Her2 positive breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant treatment is correlated with pathological complete responses

Thursday 6 February 2020
Applications:

Nikaoly Ciriaco1, Esther Zamora3, Santiago Escrivá3, Rosa Somoza1, Javier Hernández-Losa1, Santiago Ramón y Cajal1, Martín Espinosa-Bravo2, Kaja Wieghardt4, Hillary Sloane4, Anna Starus4, Frank Holtrup4, Johannes Fredebohm4, Daniel L. Edelstein4, Lucy Georgieva5, Graham Speight5, Frederick S. Jones4, and Vicente Peg1

1Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 2Breast Surgical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 3Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 4Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore , USA, 5Oxford Gene Technology, Oxford, UK

Want to download this as a PDF? Download now

Background

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is being used widely to eliminate tumor burden in breast cancer (BC) patients; the primary goal of such treatments is to reduce the cancer prior to surgery. Although the standard of care is to perform surgery of primary BC after NAT, it is well known that for certain patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR), surgery following such treatment may be unnecessary.

Neoadjuvant treatment is being used widely to eliminate tumor burden in breast cancer (BC) patients

Previous studies have shown that levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during therapy and post-surgery can stratify patients that exhibit effective responses vs. those showing minimal residual disease. In this study, we performed longitudinal tracking of plasma TP53 and PIK3CA mutations pre-specified from NGS analysis of tumor tissue specimens from HER2-positive (HER2) and triple negative (TN) BC patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess ctDNA clearance during NAT as a correlate to effective response to treatment, as benchmarked by clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR). To accomplish this, a prospective study was conducted to identify patient-specific PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in tissue using SureSeq NGS technology, which could then be used to track the presence/absence of mutations prior to, during, and following NAT using Sysmex SafeSEQ technology.

Study to identify patient-specific PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in tissue

 

Patients and Methods

In total, 29 TN and HER2-positive BC patients were examined in this study. Tumor tissue samples from all patients were first examined for mutations in both the PIK3CA or TP53 genes using SureSeq technology (Oxford Gene Technology) after isolation of DNA using Qiasymphony DNA Tissue Kits. Individualized plasma ctDNA detection assays using SafeSEQ technology (Sysmex Inostics) were then applied to detect the specific mutations identified in tissue. Mutation detection was carried out in serial plasma samples in each BC patient at baseline prior to NAT, at treatment mid-point, and at post-treatment immediately prior to surgery. ctDNA analyses were performed only on patient samples in which a specific TP53 or PIK3CA mutation had been initially identified in that patient’s tissue. All patients underwent a surgical excision after NAT. Patient characteristics are shown below in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient characteristics

Method

Results

  • Of the 29 patients, 20 (69%) were found to have TP53 and/or PIK3CA mutations in tissue, as assessed by SureSeq.
  • Of these 20 BC patients with mutations identified in tissue, 19 (95%) and 6 (30%) were found to have at least 1 TP53 or PIK3CA mutation, respectively, with 6 patients (30%) being positive for both TP53 and PIK3CA mutations. PIK3CA mutations were found predominantly in HER2-positive BC patients (37.5%), whereas PIK3CA mutations were found in only 7.7% of TN BC patients. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of TN BC patients (84.6%) showed at least one TP53 mutation.
  • Of the 20 patients with TP53 and/or PIK3CA mutations identified in tissue, 17 (85%) showed detectable mutations using SafeSEQ in the plasma sample taken at baseline.
  • The 17 patients having ctDNA detected at baseline were tracked longitudinally during NAT to correlate presence of ctDNA with efficacy of treatment (see Table 2). 12/17 patients attained clinical complete response (cCR) following NAT (8 TN BC; 4 HER2+), as indicated in green in Table 2. In contrast, 5 patients did not achieve cCR (3 TN BC; 2 HER2+), indicated in pink in Table 2.
  • Of 15 patients with plasma samples available at mid-treatment, 5 (33%) showed detectable ctDNA (3 cCR patients vs 2 non-cCR patients).
  • Immediately prior to surgery, 16/17 patient plasma samples were available for testing. Only 3 of these patients (18.8%) showed detectable ctDNA, and, importantly all 3 did NOT show cCR. Interestingly, none of the 11 cCR patients whose plasma was evaluated at surgery showed detectable ctDNA.
  • Finally, in 37 plasma samples collected from the 17 patients over 3 time points post-surgery, no sample showed detectable ctDNA.

Figure 1. Representative plots of longitudinal ctDNA tracking.Figure 1. Representative plots of longitudinal ctDNA tracking. Two patients (Patient 17 and 5) show complete clearance of TP53 mutations in plasma before surgery, which is associated with cCR to NAT. Mutant Molecules/mL (MM/mL)

Table 2. Results of longitudinal ctDNA analysis.

Table 2. Results of longitudinal ctDNA analysis. TP53 and PIK3CA mutations identified in plasma at baseline (pre-NAT) are listed under “baseline plasma” in the table above. These mutations were assessed again at multiple time-points: mid-NAT, post-NAT (“surgery”), and at 3 time-points post-surgery (10w, 6m, and 12m). Samples with ctDNA detected are indicated by an “x”, whereas samples determined to be ctDNA negative are indicated by blank cells. “NA” denotes samples that were not available for analysis. TNBC patients indicated in blue text; HER2+ patients indicated in black text. Green highlighted cells indicate patients with cCR; Pink highlighted cells indicate patients with NO cCR.

Conclusions

  • SafeSEQ NGS technology identified 17/20 (85%) BC patients with detectable mutations in plasma at baseline, enabling the vast majority of patients to be tracked via liquid biopsy during/following NAT.
  • The absence of ctDNA following NAT was observed in 100% of cCR patients, indicating a favorable correlation with effective NAT response; moreover, the presence of ctDNA following NAT may associate with the lack of clinical/pathological complete response in BC patients.
  • These findings prompt further studies/trials to investigate the value of ctDNA to predict clinical/pathological response that may aid in determining whether surgery is really necessary following neoadjuvant treatment.

 

SureSeq: For research use only. Not for diagnostic procedures.

Download Literature